Legal document

The comprehensive legal document is also a platform in which Masque shares his account of the founding of “Open A. Which.” And his views that he has been reiterating about the danger of artificial intelligence to society.

However, the crux of the matter, according to Masque, is that “Open A. Which.” It violated its initial agreement providing for the sharing of its technologies with the public, rather than achieving special commercial success.

“Open A. Which.” Respond with reading

 

Oppen A. replied. Which.” Quickly on the charges of Masque through a comprehensive reading on its website, it addressed every point it made in the legal case. In a long text, the Foundation stands out for its previous mask support for the “Open A.” conversion. Which.” To a profit-making party, confirming that he supported this idea before leaving the board of directors in 2018. “Open A. Which.” He caught trying to merge the institution with Tesla, his company, noting that his position on its mission had changed.

 

The reading also reveals a series of emails exchanged between Masque and the managers of “Open A. Ay. “, Provides a look at the evolution of the company’s goals and the change of Mask’s opinions.

The correspondence includes an email from a mask in which it supports the idea that “it is completely natural” not to share the knowledge on which artificial intelligence is based with the public، He only mentioned his fears that he would leak into dishonest hands.

Publicly, Mask moved to social media, making fun of “Open A. Which.” And Altman. On his platform، “X (formerly Twitter)، Renamed “Open A. Which.” (Open AI) “Close A. Which.” (Closed Artificial Intelligence), and shared a distorted image of Altman with a badge written on it “Close A. I., stressing the shift towards keeping technology secret.

 

Stage Star Sam Altman, CEO of Open A. I., in a panel discussion entitled “Technology in a troubled world” during the Davos meetings, Switzerland, January 18, 2024. 

Legal experts raise suspicions about the feasibility of a Mask suit, questioning his legal position and the possibility of facing judicial problems. The absence of a solid foundation contract with formal agreements and signatures adds another layer of complexity to legal procedures.

When confidence collapses

 

The alliance between Mask is now transforming Order of Altman، Which was characterized by mutual trust and the achievement of common goals, to a public information and judicial event. Mask, which was a role model for Altman in the early 2000s, played a vital role in establishing “Open A. I. “And their cooperation, caused by a common concern about the dangers of artificial intelligence, reached the climax in forming the institution in 2015.

With the crossing of “Open A. Which.” Her early years, signs of tension began to appear in the partnership. Musk, known for his little patience, suggested merging “Open A. Which.” With Tesla and conducting staff transfers, the worsening tension increased. The departure of Mask from the Board of Directors of “Open A. Which.” 2018 was a step to get rid of conflicts of interest with Tesla, but it was the beginning of a more critical stage in an open form in its relationship with the institution.

After the birth of “Chat Ji. In me. T.”

The dispute escalated with the launch of “Open A. Which.” The “Chat Ji” program. In me. T.” And its subsequent development a year and a half ago. In an interview via Boudcast, Altman described the catcher as “clumsy”, while acknowledging his dedication to a better future for artificial intelligence. He criticized the catcher publicly, “Chat Ji. Open A. Which.” As influenced by the left-wing social movement “Wook”, a chat robot called a “Grock”, he failed to get broad support.

The legal battle increases the challenges facing “Open Ai”, as the institution faces additional legal cases related to the violation of the rights of authors and Illegal use of original works To train its tools for artificial intelligence.

Behind the courtroom walls

 

The scene of artificial intelligence is now a witness to a giant struggle, with traces beyond the courtroom. The dispute between Mask and Altman raises questions about governance and ethical considerations related to advanced AI technologies.

The events also confirm the complexities inherent in directing an institution towards its original, “non-profit” mission, in light of the rapidly evolving dynamics of the technology industry.

OpenAI legal battle conclusion

 

In conclusion, the public Mask-Altman series is a warning to the AI community, as it highlights the delicate balance between ambition and cooperation and the challenges of maintaining a shared vision in a field with enormous transformative potential.

Legal procedures, full of doubts and complications, may redefine the course of “Open A. Which.” The broader dialogue related to the development of artificial intelligence and its dissemination in a responsible form.