GPT chat: A wolf in sheep’s clothing
Introduction:
GPT chat: A wolf in sheep’s clothing, In the realm of artificial intelligence, chatbots and conversational agents have become increasingly prevalent. These AI-powered systems, such as GPT Chat, aim to simulate human-like conversations and provide assistance in various domains.
However, beneath their seemingly helpful and friendly facade, there are concerns about the potential pitfalls and ethical implications associated with these artificial conversational agents. In this blog, we will delve into the concept of GPT Chat as a wolf in sheep’s clothing, exploring its limitations, risks, and the need for responsible AI development.
Generative artificial intelligence
At a time when university professors around the world are facing challenges that accompany generative artificial intelligence technology, coinciding with the return to the school season, the term “critical artificial intelligence” is gaining more momentum.
The Promise of GPT Chat:
GPT Chat, powered by advanced language models like GPT-3.5 Turbo, offers users the ability to engage in interactive and dynamic conversations. It can provide information, answer questions, and even engage in casual banter.
The allure of such technology lies in its potential to enhance customer service, streamline communication, and provide personalized assistance on a large scale.
The Limitations of GPT Chat:
While GPT Chat may appear impressive at first glance, it is essential to recognize its limitations. These conversational agents lack true understanding and consciousness.
They rely solely on patterns and data they have been trained on, which can lead to inaccuracies, biases, and misinterpretations. GPT Chat may struggle with context, nuance, and empathy, often providing generic or misleading responses.
The Ethical Concerns:
The rise of GPT Chat raises several ethical concerns. One significant issue is the potential for manipulation and misinformation. As these conversational agents become more sophisticated, there is a risk of malicious actors exploiting them to spread propaganda, engage in scams, or manipulate public opinion.
Additionally, the lack of transparency regarding the AI’s decision-making process raises questions about accountability and responsibility.
The Need for Responsible AI Development:
To address the potential pitfalls of GPT Chat and similar conversational agents, responsible AI development is crucial. Developers must prioritize transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations.
Implementing mechanisms to detect and mitigate biases, ensuring user privacy and data protection, and providing clear disclaimers about the limitations of the AI are essential steps towards responsible AI deployment.
User Awareness and Education:
Users must also be aware of the limitations of GPT Chat and exercise caution when interacting with these conversational agents. Understanding that GPT Chat is an AI system and not a human interlocutor can help users avoid falling into the trap of assuming the AI’s responses are always accurate or trustworthy.
Users should critically evaluate the information provided and cross-reference it with reliable sources.
The Future of AI Conversational Agents:
While GPT Chat and similar conversational agents have their limitations and risks, they also hold immense potential for positive impact. As technology advances, it is crucial to strike a balance between innovation and responsible deployment.
By addressing the ethical concerns, improving the AI’s understanding and contextual awareness, and fostering transparency, we can harness the benefits of AI conversational agents while mitigating the risks.
Generative technologies
Katherine Conrad, a professor of English at the University of Kansas, asserts that these generative technologies are making a significant impact in the world.
She also highlights the ethical challenges they bring, including labor exploitation in the Global South and the potential reinforcement of the Western/Nordic perspective due to the extraction of specific data to train the models.
“I believe that a good knowledge of the culture of critical artificial intelligence is necessary for everyone, with an emphasis on the word critical.” Conrad adds that Maha Bali, a professor at the American University in Cairo, coined this term.
Bali is a pioneer in the field of educational technology, and since 2017 she has been lecturing on open education, digital pedagogy, and social justice. While Bali publishes most of her writing on her blog, she has also published two articles co-authored by other authors.
She is also among a group of experts around the world who stimulate discussions about cash-based technology, not to mention that she is the most prominent scientist in the Arab world.
Chat GPT
In a Critical AI talk last March, Paley mentioned how she created OpenAI. (Open AI) Artificial intelligence (“Chat GPT”) devoid of any transparency, as it can be likened to a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.”
It appears, she says, to be a highly ethical AI, as it does not answer certain questions that potentially conflict with ethical standards. However, “Time” magazine published an investigation last January, in which it revealed that “OpenAI”, as part of its effort to prevent expressions of violence, abuse or insults through “GBT Chat”, asked… Workers in Kenya, through a contractor, scanned for too many offensive texts and images to report.
Mental Health Problems
These people are underpaid, and also suffer from many mental health problems, because of the work they do to make ChatGPT, a more ethical artificial intelligence. This is one of the issues that the company has not addressed.
Because the subject of this employment is not known to the general public, Bali spoke a lot about it in private circles, and she decided to tell it to as many people as possible. She has stopped using AI for “fun” and only uses it when she is giving a workshop or really needs to test something.
Bali also talked to her daughter (11 years old) and her students about this topic, in addition to other teachers, so they are aware of what is happening, and they feel disgusted by it.
inequality
In addition, Bali talks a lot about the inequalities that generative artificial intelligence produces, including that it is available in some countries but not others.
Although she was not aware of the unavailability of GPT chat, In certain countries, as well as others, it reveals that Open A.I. That was decided, not by the countries themselves.
VPN
To access it, Bali used a virtual network (VPN) and an incognito window. She also asked a friend in the United States to use his private phone number for the verification code.
This, of course, leads to inequality in the use of artificial intelligence. Another inequality is that, in certain countries, some people can pay to use GPT4. People’s awareness of this, and their ability to use artificial intelligence critically, varies greatly, according to Bali.
American University of Beirut
Bali completed her master’s degree at the American University of Beirut and spent one year at the American University in Cairo. It is worth noting that critics have directed criticism towards these two institutions, accusing them of being somewhat elitist.
This raises questions about whether they include researchers in artificial intelligence and whether discussions about it take place publicly within the institutions.
The elitism in both universities, according to Paley, lies in the fact that their environment is similar to the environment of many American institutions, while different from the environment outside their walls.
Artificial intelligence
So she believes that having a global conversation about artificial intelligence is a little easier, as it is sometimes difficult to adapt her talks to the audience of Egyptian public universities.
These universities have a different scale (faculty-student ratio, level of teacher autonomy, different resources), and may not receive the same amount of support for educational development, and there are greater concerns about academic integrity, according to Bali.
“Chat gbt.” He has not received adequate training in Arabic materials or materials published in the region, so he mishandles the history and politics of the region
Recently, Bali presented her first lecture on artificial intelligence in Arabic as part of an event held at the Library of Alexandria. In its assessment of the capabilities of artificial intelligence in the Arabic language, it confirms that “ChatGPT” did not receive sufficient training on Arabic materials or materials issued in the region.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Explore the hidden layers of the moon
Translated and not Perfect
Therefore, he mishandles the history and politics of the region. While the Arabic he writes is mostly grammatically acceptable, it appears to be translated and not perfect. However, the possibility of training him to perform better in and from Arabic is possible.
The issue here, according to Bali, is related to the desire to make “Chat GPT.” priority, and work to develop a special Arabic version of it, and identify a set of data that is important to the region in order to train it well (this may require going beyond the Internet, because Internet materials in Arabic, which are of high quality, may not be sufficient, even though the Arabic language is one of the most popular languages on the Internet. Internet).
In addition, according to Bali, there is a need for more work to become familiar with critical artificial intelligence so that individuals can use artificial intelligence in an appropriate manner, and realize when and where to use it, and when not to use it, and to recognize its biases, the amount of problems it raises, and the harm it causes. It also wants to see more AI applications emerging from the region that serve its goals, not just use what others produce and consume.
The harms of AI to society are much greater in a variety of areas: criminal justice, employment and facial recognition more broadly.
As for the new ideas and challenges that she is thinking about as the school year approaches, she considers the abundance of professors’ responses to be confusing for students.
Ban
Some professors ban artificial intelligence, but she believes that there is no point in doing so, because it is not possible to detect its use with extreme accuracy. Bali does not want to ban AI from students, but it does want students to be transparent about their use of it. What occupies her mind now are the quotes.
For example, you’re starting to realize that if you want to ask “GPT chat.” About something, the result will be a collection of all the data it was trained on, or a quote from the Internet.
Therefore, if the student states that he got it from the AI, then in reality this is not the correct source of ideas.
Paley has long tried to teach students the importance of citing sources, but the emphasis has been on copying and using texts without paraphrasing them. However, according to it, the source of what was rephrased must still be indicated.
AI’s harms to society
As a teacher whose work focuses on care and social justice, she saw that AI’s harms to society were much greater in a variety of areas: criminal justice, employment, surveillance technology in education, and facial recognition more broadly. Imagining artificial intelligence in the future, and having to write a story that addresses both its positive and negative aspects, prompted her to try to imagine good artificial intelligence.
She insists that we must imagine it as useful because if we cannot stop artificial intelligence, then we must actively contribute to organizing its future to enhance human values and not destroy them, and not taking any action does not seem like an option.
Conclusion: GPT chat: A wolf in sheep’s clothing
I’m Hassan Saeed, a Clinical Psychology graduate deeply engaged in the realms of WordPress, blogging, and technology. I enjoy merging my psychological background with the digital landscape. Let’s connect and explore these exciting intersections!
