Sam Altman Let’s save that name

The stormy launch of the “ChatGPT” project returns. To the parent company, OpenAI. Which was founded in San Francisco in late 2015, and is run by Sam Altman, a 37-year-old businessman and former president of the startup incubator, Y Combinator. The company established itself from the beginning by relying on the financial support of prominent contributors from Silicon Valley, including the co-founder of LinkedIn, Reed Hoffman, and investors Peter Thiel, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever, John Shulman, and Wiczak Zaremba, in addition to Elon Musk, who participated in the board of directors. He ran it until 2018 before returning to focus on his responsibilities at Tesla, which described the chatbot as “frighteningly good.”

Musk has expressed on several occasions his concerns about the negative control of artificial intelligence, saying that “the goal of ‘Open AI’ “Democratizing artificial intelligence,” starting from the concept that “freedom stems from the distribution of power, while tyranny results from its confinement.” “It is therefore important that the amazing power of AI does not rest in the hands of a few people.”

Universities are on alert… and JP Morgan bans it. 

It is clear that Chat GPT has… Exceptional capabilities to help users produce more coherent, professional content and text that may be suitable for some light or commercial social media, which will allow it to generate huge revenues through advertising and marketing. However, his capabilities go far beyond that, to include engineering designs, completion of studies, long-term business strategies, marketing plans, and market research, according to Forbes magazine, by inquiring about the main competitors in any sector.

Demonstrates the ability of GPT Chat. To pass high-level university exams in various specializations, including medicine, law, and other MBA exams, as stated by Wharton University in Pennsylvania, which subjected the chatbot to such a test, as well as creating content and texts for video clips, podcasts, and translation.

In a glaring irony, ChatGBT, who had passed the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), failed miserably in the sixth-grade exams in Singapore, achieving 16 percent in mathematics and 21 percent. In science subject. However, he returned and achieved success in the same tests when they were repeated, proving his ability to develop his own energy and self-learn from mistakes.

“GPT Chat” program

While a number of companies are planning to integrate the “GPT Chat” program. In its work, it is quickly being banned in other areas, such as education, especially in schools and universities. In New York, for example, the city’s Department of Education ruled to ban the program across all devices and networks in New York public schools. This is due to the real danger of students exploiting it to write their research, solve their assignments, and copy the content provided to them.

JPMorgan banned its employees from using GPT chat. Driven by concerns about sensitive financial information being shared with the chatbot, it becomes the latest entity to restrict the use of the chatbot in the workplace after Amazon, which warned its employees against sharing any code or confidential information about the company with ChatGBT. The company found that some of the chatbot’s answers resembled Amazon’s internal data.

As for China, it banned “GPT chat.” Another reason is that he does not comply with the country’s political censorship laws.

On the other hand, OpenAI offered The same companies and other companies have anti-fraud programs that detect fraud in writing research papers and articles using chatbots, such as “GPT-Classifier,” “AI Writing Check,” and “GPT.” GPTZero and others. More than 6,000 professors at Harvard, Yale, and Rhode Island universities have participated in the “GBT Zero” program, which promises to monitor any text produced by artificial intelligence, according to Edward Tian, ​​a designer. program and a graduate student at Princeton University.

Ethics and Intellectual Property Rights

Although “ChatGPT.” Programmed to refuse to respond to illegal or unethical requests, it may sometimes react to harmful instructions, display biased behavior, or provide access to false information and conspiracy theories. To address this issue, Open.AI has used the moderation API to warn about certain types of content, or to block these types of content that are classified as unsafe, such as asking how to bully someone, or asking about how to bully someone. A bloody story, or about how to manipulate people or create dangerous weapons.

The issue of intellectual property rights has emerged as one of the most important ethical aspects that must be dealt with, not only in terms of creating content without mentioning its original owners, but also because the program fabricates research studies and false sources and associates them with the names of experts or writers who have nothing to do with them in accordance with its mechanism for collecting information. Such as what David Smerdon, assistant professor of economics at the University of Queensland, said on his Twitter account when asked, “Chat GBT.” About the most cited economic research of all time, only to discover that the title in the answer was false and fabricated by stealing an identical title from an actual book without verifying the real authors.

We may soon witness legal battles between writers, artists in particular, and artificial intelligence companies over intellectual property rights that actually reflect the value of human creativity.

Fierce competition awaits

in returning to Google. Let us remember the story of the expulsion of one of its engineers, Blake Lemoine, because of his description of Google’s “LaMDA” robot, which made newspaper headlines at the time (July 2022). , that he is so realistic that he believes himself to be conscious. There are more than 300,000 chatbots in use on Facebook Messenger alone. There are many other examples of similar software developed by Microsoft, Amazon, and Stanford University, all of which have received much less attention than OpenAI. Or “Google”.

What distinguishes GPT Chat, despite it being relatively new in the world of artificial intelligence and technology, will pose a challenge to the Google search engine, as Open AI expects. It earned $200 million from its new system this year and $1 billion in 2024, as Reuters reported.

In another competitive move for Google, Microsoft also announced the integration of GPT chat. In its search engine, “Bing”. However, poor performance prompted it to limit conversations to only five questions per use, and 50 questions per day. The inaccurate, suspicious, and confusing answers that some users received raised doubts about the success of this step.
Microsoft expects that its annual advertising revenues will grow by $2 billion, for every additional percentage point it gains in market share from the search engine.

Intelligence of future generations?

It may be too early to judge the future implications of “generative artificial intelligence,” as discussing the expectations of the professional version (ChatGPT Professional) might not fully capture the impact it will have on individuals and companies.

Until now, OpenAI is still… She is not aware of the amount of interaction and participation that the new version will receive, as it is not yet possible to distinguish between serious users, those who are enthusiastic, and curious viewers.

This new “machine” may be able to print, narrate, or compile millions of novels, and generate billions, but it will never be able to compose a single novel with a human soul, or write a great cosmic poem, and the words written with the obsessions of ink, blood, sweat, feelings, and subconscious will remain stronger than any machine, no matter how intelligent it is. Sharpness… The most important thing is to be aware of the implicit dangers of these algorithms to human privacy, societies, and the future intelligence of future generations.